Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesca Willis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  21:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Francesca Willis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This person's claim to fame is the controversy from her suggestive photo shoots in her school uniform. She's received no significant coverage (if any) whatsoever outside of this event. This is a good example of WP:BLP1E, which says "If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted." Spellcast (talk) 05:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete If this can be deleted rather quickly, it should be as well as the photo. Subject was a minor at the time the photos and controversy occured. Does not meet notability for WP:BLP1E, also, see section on same page regarding basic human dignity. A single mistake a 17 year old made is not article material.--Finalnight (talk) 05:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the only independent source is about the controversy, not the person, which seems to mean notability has not been established. The other sources are a blog, myspace, and a profile at her place of work.  Those source do not establish notability. LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Move to Francesca Willis controversy or Francesca Willis photo incident or something, and rewrite to focus on the incident. The event is somewhat notable, but the person is not. If I'm wrong, and the event is nn, then delete. Rdbrewster  ♪  ♫  ♪  09:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: I'd guess she or her agent released the photos to get some free publicity and it worked a treat. Wikipedia is not for PR purposes. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 09:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I'm unsure if an article on the "incident" should be the subject of an article, but I in agreement that a bio article is not warranted at this stage in her career. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.