Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Pompei


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Big Dom  16:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Francesco Pompei

 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * Non-notable person. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:01, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Don't Delete. In opposition to the request for deletion the subject, Dr. Pompei, is a subject matter expert in the fields of temperature sensing and thermometry. His development of the temporal scanner was a significant advancement in the field of medical thermometry.  The article was updated on March 29th to include only a sampling of the 60 patents Dr. Pompei holds.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by VaughnSmyth (talk • contribs) 14:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Seriously, just using the provided links in the AFD makes it pretty clear this individual is notable. Perhaps the article needs work, but not deleting.  Scientists who is a a prolific author and inventor, with plenty of ghits for news and such.  Try looking him up on Google Books and Google Scholar.   Dennis Brown (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing on GS except Patents. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC).
 * Comment. These are not patents. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Dennis Brown.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 12:20, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Sufficient sourcing appears to exist.  The GScholar results by themselves wouldn't necessarily manage WP:ACADEMIC, but looking at that holistically with what I see available on Gbooks, etc, it seems plausible we could write a good encyclopedia article here--and in the end, that's the most important bar.  --joe deckertalk to me 20:40, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.