Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Vitali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:29, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Francesco Vitali

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. This promotional piece offers nothing in the way of references to establish notability. Full of puffery, many of the theatre credits are questionable (are these student productions? Where were they performed? Were they ever reviewed?) and the television credit appears to be a fairly minor role. No proof offered that this person has written a "best seller" (not even a title for the book). Steamroller Assault (talk) 12:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. It is entirely possible that notability could be established through providing details of Vitali's failed vanity production of Hamlet, which received some press in Los Angeles. However, that could possibly fall under WP:ONEEVENT, and would require a full article rewrite. Steamroller Assault (talk) 13:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 00:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete the Hamlet farrago is a one-time local-interest-only event; if it wasn't for the vague involvement of Mr Clooney, it probably wouldn't even merit a mention. The rest is pure unsourced self-aggrandisement. Facebook and Twitter do not spell RS! Yunshui (talk) 12:56, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.