Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francheezie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --VoL†ro/\/Force 00:42, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Francheezie
Non-notable recipe.  Birgitte SB  15:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN food. Bearian 00:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep appears to be a decent amount of coverage by reliable sources . --W.marsh 19:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Of the 264 cites there, 227 of them are from 1972-1974, and not a single one of them is from after 1989. A brief dazzle of spotlight != notability. Given that, there is almost nothing to say about this other than what is already said in the article. An article that can never be more than a stub is a prime candidate for delete. - Che Nuevara 22:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not paper... documenting nearly-forgotten information is actually one of the cooler things we can do, so long as the information is verifiable. Obviously some people remember this. --W.marsh 14:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like a dic-def for a dead neologism for some junk food I'd probably like. Cool Hand Luke 05:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete definitely non-notable, with short context and lack of sources as well. --Angelo 19:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Article does not assert what is notable about this particular food. Cheers, CP 20:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.