Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Di Fronzo (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 10:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Francis Di Fronzo
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Puff piece about a non-notable artist. Only claim to fame seems to be that he once got a fellowship. Was kept for some reason when nominated earlier, despite 1 keep vote versus several deletes. R. fiend (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The fellowship itself is a local one, and there is no other information in the article to support notability.  The criteria for notability for this are at WP:ARTIST, and a quick google search doesn't turn up anything that might fit any of those; he's just a guy with a job.  He has exhibited his artwork, and his name does appear in some catalogues of artists with a short bio, but I'm not sure this makes him notable.  --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 17:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Aside from being a Fellowship recipient in 2004 (which I've now referenced into the article), all that I've found are a couple of listings mentions. They aren't enough to meet WP:ARTIST, nor I think is being one of 12 fellowship recipients in one particular year. AllyD (talk) 22:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete being the reciepeient of a Pew Fellowship does not grant notability. Lacks any actual meeting of notability requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absense of secondary sources sufficient to establish notability. Gamaliel (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.