Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Lee (comic book creator)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Francis Lee (comic book creator)
Advert/Vanity KillerChihuahua?!? 19:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The contributions of the article's creator show an intention only to advertise and write vanity. Check out the history of Francis Lee. Someone also needs to delete the duplicate images uploaded by this editor. &mdash;WAvegetarian&bull;(talk) 20:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above Artw 21:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WAvegetarian; a shocking piece of vanity. Besides, everyone knows there's only one Francis Lee: the Bog-roll King. --die Baumfabrik 03:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment AfD blanked by The Traveller - reverted. Tevildo 17:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment AfD blanked by The Traveller a second time - reverted, test2a message left. KillerChihuahua?!? 12:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Alias Flood 17:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Baumfabrik. Please, no more "boyhood dream" celebrations on WP, unless maybe jock-related and unusually notable. Hope the comics are better laid-out than this article. ;-) --DaveG12345 18:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 14:27, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * DO NOT DELETE As this is supposed to be an open and free website designed to share information with the world One is forced to ask the question "Why are there people on this site who feel the need to submit pages for deletion and voice such petty and small minded comments..?" Could it be that these people can only raise the level of ther own fragile insecure egos by pulling down other people. Surely it is better to allow the inclusion of pages such as this and allow the visitors to the website the option of forming their own opinions about the page or indeed allow them the option to amend the page as they see fit rather than just delete it in such an extreme form of censorship. Anyone would think that this site is being operated by Fascists given the arbitrary way in which its administrators appear to be setting themselves up as gods with the power to tell people what to think whilst still purporting to be administering a "Free and Open" knowledge source.The Traveller —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Traveller (talk • contribs) 13:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.