Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Mugavero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Snow Keep and nom withdrawn. Non-admin closure by -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Francis Mugavero
The article doesn't state the notability of Francis Mugavero, and violates WP:NOTE as well as WP:VERIFY. Francis Mugavero apparently only has 493 hits on Google and 454 on Yahoo! . — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  06:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - The office is notable, as the first Italian-American bishop of Brooklyn has additional notability, and his tenure was quite long. Vrac (talk) 06:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is ridiculous!! User:Cuyler91093 apparently did not even read the article or he/she would have known that Mugavero was Bishop of one of the largest dioceses in the United States. There are five or six links provided how did the article violate WP:VERIFY. Absolutely ridiculous!! Askedandanswered (talk) 06:18, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think you should explain some of the terminology more. I, personally, am not religious, and I am not familiar with some of the terms. I apologize if I have offended you, but you need to explain that being a bishop of that particular diocese is important. Again, I apologize, and hope that you define terms a bit more. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  06:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I retract this nomination, as I don't believe it's necessary to go through with this. Upon reading wikilinks, he sounds important. Just note that I added some notability to the page, and I fixed a wikilink that had parentheses in it. I'm sorry for any trouble I may have caused. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  06:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I change my vote to Keep. With a little more editing, this page can be more notable. Askedandanswered, I answered your talk page, and I hope you're not too offended. I apologize to everybody about this. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  06:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.