Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Tuttle

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 03:02, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Francis Tuttle
Non-notable, delete. Neutralitytalk 21:38, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable.  Quale 00:12, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as with others, possibly at Francis Tuttle (school). Christopher Parham 00:31, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good stub. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 00:59, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Let's talk this over on Schools.  --BaronLarf 01:42, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep (or merge with Oklahoma City, OK; borderline case) per my school article policy. Kelly Martin 02:24, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, good stub, important topic. Kappa 07:24, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:VAIN. Radiant_* 08:55, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:VAIN. Master Thief Garrett 03:16, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Education facilities and encyclopedias go together better than coffee and a donut.--Unfocused 04:09, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, WP:DICK. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 07:58, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete = not notable. NoAccount 03:14, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Your account is 3 days old, that's notable. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 03:29, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. (1)We don't even have a policy about schools yet, (2)schools are important and should be included, (3)this massive deletion campaign is terrible. Introduce a limit of 3 vfd nominations per day. --Zantastik 22:23, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This respsonse is a disruptive comment on the level of User:Iasson. Refrain from attempting to make policy on VfD pages.  RickK 23:57, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Neutrality nominates several dozen school articles for deletion within a 48 hour period, and you find the reaction to be disruptive? Alrighty then.  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 01:57, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable school worthy of inclusion. Klonimus 23:38, 22 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.