Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisco D'Agostino (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Francisco D'Agostino
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NPROF. (Note, while this may say fourth nom, the previous noms were for a Venezuelan by the same name). Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak delete: my research was cursory, but under the listed name I mostly get results about the guy we deleted last time. Under "Francesco D'Agostino", I mostly get results about the assistant coach to the Italian men's soccer team. After parsing through those two lists I might find information about an Italian jurist who consults with the Papacy on abortion and family law. There are 3 articles reviewing one of his works listed as references in this article, but I think that points more to that article being possibly notable than to the author being possibly notable. Rockphed (talk) 16:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.