Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisco Hernández Ortiz-Pizarro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator;  no outstanding delete !votes. Non-admin closure. KuyaBriBri Talk 18:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Francisco Hernández Ortiz-Pizarro

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Definite lack of reliable sources showing up in Google web search, and Google Books appears to have only two brief mentions. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Withdrawing per evidence of external sourcing shown below.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - I don't imagine 16th-century Chilean history is very well representd on the web, but the article in the "External link" has a note saying "Este articulo -extractado de nuestra obra inédita Francisco Hernández Ortiz Pizarro, Capitán de la Conquista, Fundador de Calbuco- fue publicado en la revista Cuadernos de Caicaen Historia y Folklore desde las Islas N° 2 pp.12-18 Calbuco 1992. " and the next ref implies that he's in Diccionario Biográfico Colonial Chileno, which looks good enough notability for me. PamD (talk) 17:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * And is AfD really appropriate 42 minutes after article creation? By the way, note that the article author won't be able to join this discussion for some 31 hours! Ah, perhaps there was a sensible decision not to "Speedy" it while he couldn't "Hango-on"? Anyway, keep this article. PamD (talk) 17:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Exactly -- I figured 7 days would cover the block and whatever time he needed to find better sourcing. Besides, it's not speedy territory, as there is an assertion of notability in founding a settlement. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.