Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisco de Rosenzweig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Francisco de Rosenzweig

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly referenced WP:BLP of a person notable primarily as a junior civil servant. Holding an appointed role as undersecretatary for one particular policy area within a broader government ministry is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass -- it would be enough if he could be sourced over WP:GNG for it, but the only reference here is a deadlinked primary source profile on the self-published website of the government ministry he works for. A person's staff profile on the website of his own employer is not a notability-assisting source, however -- he needs to be the subject of coverage in media to qualify for an article, not just to be nominally verifiable as existing. Bearcat (talk) 15:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: I added a link confirming the subject's current job, but I am not seeing anything to indicate more than a career job summary here: neither working in a ministry nor subsequently working for a law firm is indicative of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.