Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franciszek Malinowski (journalist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Franciszek Malinowski (journalist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not comply with WP:AUTHOR. Should be deleted.  Cheers AKS  11:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - Per WP:BEFORE, Section C2, this was nominated way too soon, on the same day it was created. —  Wylie pedia  13:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment, before nominating for AfD, I checked for this person on internet and could not find any credible reason for qualification on WP:N. Waiting would not have served any purpose. Thanks for pointing out anyways. Cheers AKS  14:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Perhaps that is because he was an 82-year-old Polish journalist, whose works could probably only be found in print or on a library shelf. —  Wylie pedia  19:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The person was awarded one of the highest civil orders of the Republic of Poland. - Darwinek (talk) 20:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Of course this article must be kept. There is no justification for nominating this article for deletion and the editor who nominated this article for deletion gave none. Such hasty frivolous nominations for deletion are nothing but disruptive editing. They should be examined and editors who are seen to indulge in them too often should be warned. Contact Basemetal   here  09:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. We seem to be evolving a rule that recipients of the Order of Polonia Restituta are notable. If there are sources... why not. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep obviously notable subject, I echo Basemetal about the frivolousness of noms like these. Cavarrone  20:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Of course recipients of one of a country's highest honours are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.