Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franciszek Przysiężniak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Franciszek Przysiężniak

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability. If it gets expanded, I'll retract my nomination. Irbisgreif (talk) 23:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I just started it. Give me a minute.radek (talk) 23:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No need to worry, these discussions last days. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Expanded it a bit - his notability should be obvious now. Additionally here are 150+ books talking about him .radek (talk) 00:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Three minutes after an articles creation is not an appropriate time to bring it to AfD. I doubt very much that the nominator followed the suggested steps to see whether the subject was notable. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Three minutes or three years, there is no difference. An article that doesn't even have claims of notability is eligible for deletion. I decided to bring it to AfD rather than put it up for speedy because the person in question just might be notable. Irbisgreif (talk) 13:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * And did you, for example, look for any sources yourself? Google his name possibly? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 13:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, but most of the results are from Wiki's. Still, I'd say the article is good now. Nomination withdrawn. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

So can the tag be removed?radek (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * This will be closed soon enough. Irbisgreif (talk) 02:44, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, but I'd like to expand and DYK the article and I don't want that ugly tag on there when I nominate it.radek (talk) 01:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.