Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franck Nazikian (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to ChinICT. SarahStierch (talk) 16:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Franck Nazikian
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The last discussion was closed (by me) as a no consensus, but noting that there were sock puppetry issues (my fault for not noticing), I think it would be best to re-do the nomination. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Is it ok to semi-protect this one? Let me know if it isn't because I just did. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to ChinICT - Cut and paste of my opinion from the last AfD. Admittedly, I am not the most familiar with the tech industry but it seems like the company Nazikian founded, ChinICT, is notable even if Nazikian, himself, is not. If this was the reverse with a winery (with the winery notable but the owner not), over at WP:WINE we would merge the relevant, unbias and sourced content of the owner bio's over to the winery page and either delete or redirect the owner's page. As far as I can tell reading about Franck Nazikian in the English sources and what little I can glean from Google translate on the Chinese page, this seems like the best course. The ChinICT only needs a little about his tech experience and work with conference while other details can be deleted. AgneCheese/Wine 00:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to ChinICT - The man himself isn't particularly notable, but his company is. As the original nominator, I'd suggest folding in the few relevant details about Nazikian's tech experience into the ChinICT article.
 * Also, thanks to Kevin Gorman for catching this one, and to Mark Arsten for promptly relisting it. Those dastardly socks would've gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling editors (and that stupid checkuser, too!) Cheers, Zaldax (talk) 00:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to ChinICT per arguments of Agne and Scooby-Doo. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.