Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franco Iacomella


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Franco Iacomella

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. he may sit on several boards but there is no evidence of significant coverage. 6 gnews hits, 3 hits in gbooks and 3 hits in gscholar. LibStar (talk) 14:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I don't think he is a member of the faculty at any university. This case should be judged by the GNG, not WP:PROF. Abductive  (reasoning) 18:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only thing I found that looked like it might apply towards WP:GNG was this news story, but it mentions him only trivially. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable person User:Lucifero4
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, agree with David Eppstein, there is nothing close to sufficient here for any standard of notability. It might be worth having a look at Gleducar, where the subject of this BLP has been an active editor.  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.