Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franco Magnifico


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Franco Magnifico

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced BLP of a person of marginal notability, either sources should be added or it should be deleted. RMHED (talk) 22:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep another city councilor, with specifics asserted that should surely have been in the city news sources. Needs to be verified, not deleted. AFD is not cleanup. DGG (talk) 23:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, without sources we can't verify and can't know if there is any credible notability. --Scott MacDonald (talk) 00:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep me can verify that he is former city councillor in Winnipeg, Manitoba. That suffices to establish notability and keep.  Dloh  cierekim  01:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Prominent local figure.  The sources exist, and can be added.  CJCurrie (talk) 03:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete the world is full of thousands of local councillors, and they are not notable for being one. I could produce references for my local councillors, with lots of local press attention and so on - but are they notable outside their area. No. Members of the Winipeg City Council are not notable. And "promient local figure" is not a reason to keep - if it was we could have an article on practicaly every single councillors in the world.--UpDown (talk) 08:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No, Updown, that's not what I'm saying. You are correct in saying being a local council member is not inherently notable. For instance, those of a small city like Largo, Florida are not. Those of Pinellas's largest city, St. Petersburg, are probably not. However, BIO says, "Generally speaking, mayors are likely to meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city." Winnepeg is Manitoba's largest city and provincial capital. It's one of Canada's ten largest cities and has a population of greater than 500,000. The city council members of such a city surely qualify. Cheers,   Dloh  cierekim  14:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't say that Winipeg is a large enough city, or important enough worldwide, to pass the criteria. Cities like New York, London, Paris, maybe - Winnipeg no.--UpDown (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep again a councilman for a large city, per DGG.  P HARMBOY  (moo) (plop) 17:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.