Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francois Russo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 02:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Francois Russo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Please note this is a neutral procedural nomination; I neither support nor oppose deletion as this time, though I reserve the right to change my mind.

This article was declined at AfC and userfied. As a user page, it was brought up at MfD, where two editors thought it worthy of deletion and two indicating it should be moved to mainspace and tested at AfD. So here we are. --BDD (talk) 19:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 19:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 11:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. I cannot find any evidence that this guy meets the guidelines for inclusion or the general notability guide. — sparklism hey! 09:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I had originally flagged this at MfD before which it had been a declined AfC and a CSD A7. Since the decision to move it to article space and bring to AfD, I've been holding off, intending to reconsider whether the subject is notable. However, the article has a mixture of references that are product notices, primary sources, articles about the subject's former employer which don't appear to mention the subject, and the sort of publicity material that anyone requires to work in this field, rather than clear evidence of biographical notability. The most substantial is probably the article on the post-ism blog, but even that is as much about the firm's products than the subject. AllyD (talk) 19:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.