Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Androff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  09:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Frank Androff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer that fails GNG. 2 . O . Boxing 14:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  14:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  14:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 22:56, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. My search on Newspapers.com turned up quite a few sources about Androff. While some of the sources are routine coverage, like this two-paragraph blurb from the Associated Press, I was also able to find several in-depth articles.    While I would prefer to see more coverage outside of Minnesota periodicals, I think the news coverage is sufficient to pass the minimum requirements of WP:GNG. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 00:32, 2 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Lord Bolingbroke has turned up some sources to show the person meets GNG. Not easy since it is a pre-internet subject. Lightburst (talk) 00:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.