Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Ashdown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 14:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Frank Ashdown

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ashdown just does not pass the notability guidelines of musicians. On the side of GNG, the Church News article might be enough for one point, see here although others might argue it is too much a recapped interview without fact checking to be useable. The Palo Alto sourced article is not about him, and the other source is from his publisher. So we do not have multiple independent 3rd party secondary sources as required by the GNG. For the record I created the article, but have since come to realize that GNG requirements are more stringent. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:24, 22 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as entirely trivial as not only is the information barely anything, it's not actually significant, everything else summarizes it as this also, hence not notable. SwisterTwister   talk  07:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.