Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Britton Wenzel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Frank Britton Wenzel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: questionable notability. I did a lot of work on this article, including getting his correct dates of birth and death, but I don't think he is particularly notable and I am not sure what he is supposed to be particularly notable at being in the first place. Quis separabit? 18:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable performer and extremely local politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Malverne is nowhere near large enough a town to hand its mayors an automatic presumption of notability under WP:NPOL, so his includability would be entirely dependent on passing WP:NMUSIC for the "Britton's Orchestra" stuff. But that's all completely unsourced, and even if sources can be found I'm betting dollars to donuts that they would support the notability of the band rather than a separate standalone article about him as an individual. All we've got for sourcing here is one article in the local newspaper about his appointment to the village council and a user-generated genealogy site for his birth and death dates — and that's not enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of the fact that he doesn't pass any subject-specific inclusion criteria. Bearcat (talk) 23:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.