Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank DiPaolo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 00:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Frank DiPaolo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biography of a person notable only as a political assistant and "doorkeeper", with no substantive claim of notability that would actually get him past WP:NPOL and not nearly enough sourcing to put him over WP:GNG either. I'm sure he was a nice man, but nothing here is a reason why he would warrant an encyclopedia article. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 04:14, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 08:58, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 14:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment-Well the guy lived a VERY long time-maybe a redirect to the longest living Americans? (Now I want to see a film called the door keeper upon reading this lol)-but yeah I do have to admit how long he lives is pretty cool. Wgolf (talk) 00:56, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.