Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Enstein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Burbank Animation Studios. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. Consensus to redirect to Burbank Animation Studios, no arguments opposed the redirect. (But please, mention the video at the target.) Eligible for userfication at author's request. joe deckertalk to me 05:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Frank Enstein

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I found no significant coverage. The article starter said that the film is obscure on the talk page. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 22:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Burbank Animation Studios. I couldn't really find anything to show that this short has notability, but I don't see anything wrong with redirecting it to the studio's article and allowing the original editor to userfy the stub until they can find sources. If there's sources for this then they're more than likely going to be offline, unfortunately.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:28, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Direct to video, no credited director (not even Alan Smithee), no particularly well known stars. Contrary to the talk page comment, it's listed in IMDb, though as Frank Einstein (sic).




 * Redirect to Burbank Animation Studios as we do have just enough verifiability of this film for it to be mentioned in context at the redirect target, even though not enough to show notability for a separate article. I'm okay with usrfying to its author for continued work.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Quite definitely fails WP:NF, and I couldn't find significant coverage or even reviews. - Samuel  Tan  14:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.