Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Gaskill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  05:34, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Frank Gaskill

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

PROD removed immediately after it was placed with no changes made in article. Article fails WP:BIO to establish notability of subject. Cresix (talk) 15:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per my nomination reason above. Cresix (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for a plethora of reasons:
 * The article is blatantly promotional, it is written like an advert.
 * The sources I can find are database/directory types. There's no non-trivial coverage, and so fails WP:GNG.
 * The subject's work hasn't made a major impact in his field. He hasn't received any notable awards or recognition, and isn't a member of any selective or prestigious organisations, and so he fails WP:SCHOLAR. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 16:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.