Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Maddock High School (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  11:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Frank Maddock High School
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG The Banner  talk 18:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools,  and Alberta. Shellwood (talk) 18:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as passing 8 out of 10 factors of my standards for high schools. Bearian (talk) 16:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Enough sourcing available to meet WP:GNG, as with any other Canadian secondary school. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: Appears to be meet GNG.--Milowent • hasspoken  19:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per WP:NSCHOOL, all that a high school needs to do to be notable is to pass WP:GNG. And it does that, with coverage from the Edmonton Journal, the Drayton Valley and District Free Press, the Drayton Valley Western Review, and CTV News, as well as the sources in the article that I did not mention here. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets GNG with the sources in the article.Jacona (talk) 23:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.