Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Rumbauskas (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Frank Rumbauskas
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NOTABILITY - see note below Jytdog (talk) 17:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

This guy is an internet marketer of get rich quick programs. Lots of hype-y websites on the internet about him. The only independent source about him in the current article is a link to the appearance of his book on paperback business book NY TImes bestseller lists (not the general bestseller list - but rather paperback business books). Here is what I found with regard to sources:


 * google search ten pages out, nothing but fellow-traveller websites hyping his approach
 * google book search, same thing
 * Rumbauskas NY Times search nothing
 * WSJ seach nothing

The prior AFD had only two votes following the nomination. One of the keep !votes was from the WP:SPA account that created the article (see contribs). I do not think this would survive a deletion discussion today. So, delete per WP:GNG. Jytdog (talk) 17:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:BIO; little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:ANYBIO; appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record.  Fails WP:AUTHOR.  Magnolia677 (talk) 01:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best as although the 1st AfD was keep, there are no further convincing signs of better notability here. Delete for now at best and restart if better later, SwisterTwister   talk  05:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't meet WP:BLP. Delta13C (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.