Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Rusch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Frank Rusch

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable, couldn't find any relevant sources. Deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC PianoDan (talk) 18:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Heavy-enough citations on Google Scholar to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF, and enough published reviews of his books (now added to the article) to also make a case for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per David Eppstein, decent citations (20 papers with > 100 citations) for the field and h-index of 48. --hroest 19:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.