Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Zamani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No better sources were found. Other keep !vote did not give an indication of notability. Just because an article is well-written does not mean the topic is encyclopedic. I wish the inverse were true! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:50, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Frank Zamani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject only mentioned in passing in WP:RS. Meatsgains (talk) 00:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Provided better sources can be found.TH1980 (talk) 04:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 06:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 06:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 06:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge/Redirect – To Caspio. ShoesssS Talk 12:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Page content has been updated and meets WP:BIO guidelines. BEMMBA (talk) 20:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Definitely a keep. It's a well-crafted WP:BIO page. Cas Anya (talk) 01:17, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Pointer: Cas Anya has stated: "I’m part of Caspio’s Content Marketing team." -The Gnome (talk) 11:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete for being a promo piece as clear as they come, on a subject that does not meet notability criteria, and, naturally, with bad sourcing. Plus, whenever one watches contributors suddenly making a rare appearance out of the woodwork with the single purpose of defending the existence of an article, one has to get extra suspicious. -The Gnome (talk) 06:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment – Are you saying that editors need a minimum amount of contributions before stating an opinion? I always believed it was the quality of a User’s contributions not the quantity that carried more weight. ShoesssS Talk 08:32, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I have exactly the same opinion as you do. And I keep defending the same position about contributors. There is only one difference and that concerns sudden and single-purpose appearances in debates, i.e. RfCs, AfDs, and the like. Knowing about episodes of concerted efforts to sway Wikipedia towards this or that direction makes me suspicious. We've seen canvassing, phony accounts, kamikaze accounts, you name it. That is all I'm saying. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 10:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Does not meet WP:ANYBIO & significant RS coverage not found. Not independently notable of Caspio and there's nothing better. I would oppose a redirect / merge, as it's not a good practice when it comes to BLPs. The company may get renamed / acquired, etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:23, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.