Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franke-Schenk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 20:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Franke-Schenk

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication that subject is notable. No refs. Pepper Beast   (talk)  17:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Germany.   Pepper Beast    (talk)  17:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I think art galleries are often hard to find third party sources for but I literally can’t find any for this. The business has closed down in recent years, I don’t see any news coverage at all, and while there are book refs (inaccessible online) they all seem to be produced in association with the gallery. It looks like it was a major gallery and dealership but I can’t see any sourcing that would meet our requirements. Mccapra (talk) 04:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep As stated above, the Franke art gallery (founded in 1913), the Dr. Schenke gallery and the Franke-Schenk gallery (apparently closed in 2020) were major galleries. There are plenty references of important art work acquired through these galleries. I have found some references that establish notability. I think we should keep it.
 * Comment of the five sources added to the article, (1) is published by the gallery so not independent (2) also published by the gallery (3) passing mention of travelling exhibition dates, not in-depth coverage (4) Brief passing mention, nothing substantive (5) is a company press release shared on a full-service PR portal. On that showing it is most definitely not notable. Mccapra (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom and Mccapra source eval. Fails GNG and NORG, nothing from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  19:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.