Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franklin E. Bondonno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Franklin E. Bondonno

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable 🌊 Pacific Depths talk 02:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. 🌊 Pacific Depths talk 02:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment California Superior Court Judge --Enos733 (talk) 04:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Per WP:USCJN, state superior court judges are not inherently notable. Curbon7 (talk) 17:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Enos733 (talk) 04:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Enos733 (talk) 04:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. State superior court judges aren't "inherently" notable per WP:USCJN, but the sourcing here absolutely isn't cutting it at all in terms of establishing passage of WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 13:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete A few mentions in stories published by the Mercury News and a couple of articles when the subject was appointed. Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. --Enos733 (talk) 21:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.