Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankopan family (United Kingdom)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Frankopan family (United Kingdom)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is not a notable topic, there is almost nothing independant reporting this subject. It is sourced to poor reliable foreign verifications and is some kind of off wikipedia dispute about a name and a family dispute - redirect, if there is enough support to the House_of_Frankopan Govindaharihari (talk) 08:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I moved this contents out of House of Frankopan because it didn't really belong there, but was vaguely notable on its own merits, so I just want to make sure it's clear that I oppose the redirect because that's not a compromise solution. Please read the relevant talk pages for further explanations. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 13:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:52, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:52, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  12:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources here are weak - the only third-party sources are ones that say that these Frankopans are not really related to the Croatian family, which died out in the 17th century. Other than that we have genealogical info, their own writings and interviews, bios from places of employment, and directory listings. Therefore, the only thing notable about these folks is that they appear to be rich and they have intermarried with various European royalty. This, to me, is stuff for society pages, but is not notability in the encyclopedic sense. LaMona (talk) 02:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.