Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Josef Caballes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Not a snowball's chance... Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  10:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Franz Josef Caballes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is non-notable and fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO. It also fails WP:BLP as per the article has no verifiable sources. The article may be deleted as A7 but because of he is the founder of an org, it may be declined. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 01:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Purely promotional, fails WP:BIO badly. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Puff Piece. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Neither him nor his company appear to be notable. This is due to a lack of reliable coverage for either. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non notable in every way possible. I have Sticky PRODed this as an unsourced BLP just on the off chance something takes a drastic turn with this AfD discussion. gwickwire  talk edits 03:22, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability, could - and should - go as a CSD A7 as it is just the autobiography of a guy caught in the light of his webcam. Having his own company as a web design contractor is not evidence of notability. (Incidentally, I got led here from following the links on a newly created article about the company, created today by new editor User talk:Lerson cabela; I've nominated the company article for CSD A7.) AllyD (talk) 10:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete and WP:AGF - the author may well have believed he should have an article, it is enough to say "Autobio of someone who does not meet our notability criteria" - calling it promotional or a puff piece does not add to the discussion. Rich Farmbrough, 17:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC).


 * Delete I've just deleted the company's article for not showing significance. This one doesn't either. Peridon (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.