Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franziska Wassmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Franziska Wassmann

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Being the last person on a list of over 1,200 people is not a reason for notability. Of the three sources, the first is a trivial mention, the second is a passing mention for the sake of a joke, and the third is a Wikipedia article, which is not allowed as a source. Howicus (talk) 17:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: The wikilink is a difficult call. On one hand it would be better in an external link section, but on the other hand it is an internal link, a diff of the page cited, from 2007, before the page was trimmed and proves that it did exist at one time.-- Auric    talk  21:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see how she qualifies as notable. Being mentioned in a Cracked article on trivia isn't grounds for notability, even if Cracked didn't publish everybody's nonsense with little or no fact-checking. If she doesn't even merit a place on the list of heirs to the throne, then delete. (I don't think even a merge to criticism of Wikipedia is called for.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 21:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete There is in reality no credible source at all for the claim made in the article. Therefore not a notable person. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: She is notable. The problem is that the dilution of notability is such that she actually ends up being not notable at all.-- Auric    talk  23:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Wait, so do you think she is notable or not? Howicus (talk) 02:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Notable in that she is related to royalty, via the House of Reuss. Not notable is that she is the descendant of a composer. Not to mention that the German monarchy was eliminated in 1918. -- Auric    talk  12:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. The 1,269th person in line to a throne is not inherently notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 00:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 00:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 00:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete -- I cannot believe that any person with 50 people between them and a throne is notable;let alone over 1250. NN unless notable for other reasons.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Anthony Bradbury. Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C ) 21:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.