Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frateschi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 22:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Frateschi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article on a model railroad company has no sources. Running the name of the company through Google News results in a handful of references to an unrelated company. Wolfson5 (talk) 20:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Wolfson5 (talk) 20:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion as a contested prod. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find anything in English in a WP:BEFORE, and the only stuff I could find in Portuguese/Brazil are passing mentions that the model trains made by the company were used in some local model train shows . Other than that, couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NCORP. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The only model railway manufacturer in Latin America, has been going for 65 years and the article on Portuguese Wikipedia is more substantial. Plenty of Google hits if you search under the Portuguese name. I think this passes the notability threshold. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per Necrothesp. I found additional coverage in the US specialty magazine Model Railroad News. gidonb (talk) 01:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Necrothesp and gidonb. Svartner (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.