Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraud, Waste & Abuse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was del .`'mikka (t) 01:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Fraud, Waste & Abuse
Meaningless, unreferenced, original research, unencyclopedic.... etc! Robertsteadman 06:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Robertsteadman 06:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Chet nc (talk)(contrib) 07:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless references and sources can be cited as an aid to researchers.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   07:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 19:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment SOunds possibly encyclopedic, but needs expansion and references. Ace of Sevens 05:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unencyclopedic, unreferenced, possibly original research (or, trivial). Ted 02:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I work with U.S. DoD and this is a very common term. It is also commonly called "FWA".  The article needs expansion but it is not original research or a neologism. StuffOfInterest 15:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * del at present nonencyclopedic. You had your time to expand it, colleague, sorry. `'mikka (t) 01:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.