Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fravia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to reverse engineering.  MBisanz  talk 05:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Fravia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Poorly written POV article that does not meet WP:BIO. There are no independent sources, either. Anything that can actually be salvaged from this can be merged into reverse engineering. I propose Fravia be a redirect.  Enigma msg  04:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete My findings were consistent with the nomination. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Close nomination/Be bold! You don't need AFD to make something into a redirect. - Mgm|(talk) 10:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect: Agree with MGM. Subject is not notable enough to have a separate article. Nominator's suggestion seems to me to be the best thing to do, rather than deletion.  C h a m a l  talk 13:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the page is very useful by itself and should not be merged with anything else. Poorly or not poorly is debatable, you write better if you can! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.121.10.143 (talk) 21:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.