Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraxxon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  17:49, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Fraxxon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established for over 5 years, no references.  Puffin  Let's talk! 15:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: I'm inclined to think that sources might exist for this, but home computing before the internet age (and especially before the PC) is very poorly sampled online. I'm not as familiar with the P2000 as I am with other early systems; were there any magazines that gave regular coverage to the platform and its software? Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 22:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Searches of periodical databases turn up no articles associated with this game. No evidence of notability. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Little to no reliable sourcing. Nwlaw63 (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.