Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frazer Brown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 22:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Frazer Brown

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject of the article fails notability. Shovon (talk) 11:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not seeing anything to indicate this person passes WP:CREATIVE or WP:ENTERTAINER. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 12:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 12:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep it has references now. --Joshua Issac (talk) 16:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Collaboration with Trey Parker for directing production of Cannibal! The Musical sounds like it could render plenty of independent sources. -Verdatum (talk) 19:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment.Out of all the references mentioned above, only two actually mention Frazer Brown. We have to keep in mind that two of the references are from the same source. Again whether these sources are reliable or not, is a big question.


 * For Verdatum, a collaboration with some one may sound like rendering plenty of reliable sources, but at present I cannot find any. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 20:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - Out of all the references mentioned above, only two actually mention Frazer Brown. This is not true. In this revision of the article Frazer Brown (14:41, 1 December 2008), with 6 references, the following mention Frazer Brown: 1, 2, 4, and 5. IdeasTap.com (6) was supposed to launch today, but it has not. I think (3) just confirms the link between Edinburgh and Cannibal!. That's four references, three sources. --Joshua Issac (talk) 21:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Sources 1, 2 & 5 (as mentioned in the article) do mention Brown, but as I said 1 & 5 are from the same source. Source 3 does not mention Brown at all. Source 4 does not count. Pls refer to WP:RS. Also, fringereview.co.uk (which constitutes Sources 1 & 5) is pretty borderline case when it comes to reliablity. Even Brown's LinkedIn Profile does not suggest anything about his notability. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 05:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 07:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Sandstein   23:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Looks properly sourced now. -- Mvuijlst (talk) 10:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Properly sourced? Please refer to WP:RS. There are 9 sources now listed in the article, but none of them actually help in establishing the notability of the person. In fact, the 9th reference is from a yet to be launched website, http://www.ideastap.com/. But this version of the article says that the information was retrieved on 2nd December 2008. I also smell COI issues here. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 11:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep as now passing WP:N.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Shovon, how do the sources look to you now? Ryan 4314   (talk) 06:21, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.