Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freak (Meg song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 01:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Freak (Meg song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No references and does not meet WP:NMUSIC  Jay Jay Talk to me 20:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability, though if someone knows enough Japanese to find significant news coverage I'll happily change my 'vote'. Sionk (talk) 23:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per its position on the Oricon charts. StAnselm (talk) 03:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment There are no references to support that statement  Jay Jay Talk to me 03:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Ref added - David Gerard (talk) 12:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete. No references to back up any of the information in the article or verify notability. --DAJF (talk) 01:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Sionk. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 10:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - ref to chart position added - David Gerard (talk) 12:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment That still does not mean it is notable?  Jay Jay Talk to me 17:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NSONG - "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 12:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.