Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freak flag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 04:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Freak flag
original research Melaen 21:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --NaconKantari 21:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. On principle, we should be deleting any articles which are written in the first person: they are either vanity, advertising, original research, or something I did in school one day. Segv11 (talk/contribs) 22:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. I don't think an article being written in first-person automatically means we should delete it, though there is high correlation with the other reasons for deletion you stated.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-15 03:11Z 
 * Delete as nominated. -- Krash 17:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOR. I like Segv11's comment. Stifle 23:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete original research. Incognito 03:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.