Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreakyLinks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. - Nom has a habit of sending articles to AFD without bothering to search first .... Sources have been provided and I'd imagine they took less than 3 seconds to find!, If you're not gonna search for shit then don't nominate it .... it's that simple. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 15:55, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

FreakyLinks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. No external references. Rathfelder (talk) 21:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

 References
 * Keep – See WP:NEXIST, "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". Comfortably passes WP:GNG. Source examples below. North America1000 03:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Los Angeles Times
 * Entertainment Weekly
 * NY Daily News
 * The New York Times
 * Deseret News
 * The Western Courier
 * Entertainment Weekly
 * The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows, 1946-Present
 * Nothing that is: Millennial Cinema and the Blair Witch Controversies


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.