Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred C. Hamilton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Fred C. Hamilton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced biography of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate for political office. While there was once a time when unsuccessful candidates in leadership conventions were accepted as notable on the grounds that they added valuable context to the convention coverage, that's no longer accepted as a claim of notability in its own right if you can't claim anything else (such as actually having served as an MP or an MLA) alongside it — and there's no sourcing here to put a WP:GNG claim on either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete failed candidates at this level are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not a solidly notable politician. SwisterTwister   talk  03:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.