Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Graham (referee)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 02:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Fred Graham (referee)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Clearly a fairly prolific referee in tiers 2-4 of England but that alone does not make him notable by default. I did not find any sources exploring him in depth during a search of Google and Gnews. ProQuest was slightly better; I found this and this but, in my view, these articles do not add enough depth to build a biography from. Newspaper articles where a referee is only mentioned briefly because they made a controversial decision is arguably trivial coverage. I do not believe he meets any reasonable interpretation of WP:BASIC/WP:GNG, the former clearly says trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability. Spiderone 20:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  20:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete just because he is prolific at low level of competition does not make him notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability, fails GNG. GiantSnowman 22:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.