Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Harms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Fred Harms

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG: very few citations according to GS, no major awards, no coverage in independent reliable sources, written like a CV and not ashamed of it. Rentier (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  13:58, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  13:58, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I concur, reads like a resume.  No independent RS to establish subjects notoriety, fails WP:GNG. Cllgbksr (talk) 16:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  14:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with all said above. Can't find any references in Google News either. Derek Andrews (talk) 15:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete article from a new author which did not know that Wikipedia is not a free web space for CVs, WP:NOTCV. Happens. Ben Ben (talk) 16:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.