Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Lozano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spam. No significant independent reliable sources. Seddon talk 08:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Fred Lozano

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is an autobiography. Notability is not established. Sourced cited in the article are: subject's personal web site, subject's self-promotion, twitter, instagram, etc. Some of the sources do not even mention the subject, and none has significant coverage. Google News search returns no hits. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

This is an appropriate entry for Wikipedia. A simple Google search of the name and projects listed within the page will showcase enough notoriety throughout the web to garner a Wikipedia page.

Page cites numerous sources interviews conducted by others in regards to the person(s) work. Most entertainers these days release work via social media (solid explanation for a few sources being taken from Twitter and Instagram). Even includes a source as a legitimate website from the Prime Minister of Mongolia's son speaking of the work that this person has done. Government officials aren't legit sources nowadays? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zdjbooth (talk • contribs) 12:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Uh Zdj, that government one. Battushig? It gave me a 404 error when trying to check it. it can't count if it doesn't work. MM (I did the who in the whatnow?)  (I did it!) 13:16, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  12:38, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Delete: Twitter, Instagram, two pages showcasing his music (falling under some kind of site that lets anybody post anything), the 'everydejavu' interview page doesn't even load, the 'girlgeniuss' interview seems solid (i'm not sure if interviews are discreditable, i'm welcome to being proven they are/aren't) and self published website. On this basis i conclude that only one source could possibly hold a credit, and we all know that one isn't enough. MM (I did the who in the whatnow?)  (I did it!) 13:16, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (chat)  @ 13:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Delete Blatant self-promotion.  ArcAngel    (talk) ) 16:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of significant coverage in reliable independent sources, as above, notwithstanding SPA Zdjbooth's opinion. --Bejnar (talk) 04:13, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.