Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Schott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox ( UTC ) 11:07, 28 May '06

Fred Schott
Basically a not notable 16 yo flash animator (nn-bio), but I'll run this through AfD. feydey 14:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Dear Feydey,

What you judge as important is not what everyone else thinks. Although this might seem unnotable to you Ruff Ruff Studios is important to many. Fred is an amazing artist and i don't see why any other flash animator should have an artical and he shouldn't. Please share reasons why this should be deleted.

Thanks, Ragner, Kieth
 * Delete - unless some credible sources can be turned up confirming that this guy is a big deal in some way, in which case I'll give it some more consideration. Tony Fox 15:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Dear Tony, I don't know how to send you a credible source, any user to write something you will surely think is a fake one. I have helped Mario Finelli Jr. at Sculch.com make a good website, creating many of the flash programs that have and are on his website. Ruff Ruff Studios has also created lots of entertaining flash, but like i stated in the artical, there is no way for us to expand our audience due to a lack of website. I hope you will reconsider your request to delete this artical, as it is important to many people who admire our work in the community.

Please Reconsider, Keith Ragner


 * Delete nn flash guy. google turns up no hits. josh  buddy talk 15:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete May be talented and have a future, but right now he's an unknown flash animator. Fan1967 15:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per excellent reason provided by Keith: "lack of a website". A major Flash animator with no website? Next you're going to tell me Bill Gates doesn't own a computer. TheProject 16:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Dear Everyone,
 * Seriously, what you judge as important may not be whateveryone else thinks. I know he is unknown to most of America he is still important to many people. Addressing the lack of a website problem, All animation by Ruff Ruff Studios are soon to be hosted on sculch.com. I never said he was a major flash animator. Also just to get this strait, he doesn't animate, Walker Downey does. Schott works out the preloaders, actionscript, and interactivity in all of thier projects.

Although he is relitivly unknown to many, so are Quality start, Hiroshi Itō, and Desert Wind. You probably don't know what they are but they still have pages.

I seriously hope that you reconsider not to delete this entry, as i means alot to many people. Please? Kieth R
 * Comment: Wikipedia has notability requirements for this kind of thing, like these requirements for biographies that I think would apply here. If it didn't, it would soon be swamped by bios of people who just plain aren't notable yet. If the fellow in this article reaches prominence enough to be written up in non-trivial published sources, then he can certainly be reconsidered at that time. Right now, he just doesn't seem to make it. Tony Fox 16:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, or maybe userfy, assuming the kid has a WP account. -- stubblyh ea d | T/c 16:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No doubt. -- Kicking222 17:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Probably could have been speedied under A7. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:10, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not encyclopedia-level notability. Deli nk 15:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm re-adding my delete vote because it was deleted by Deli nk 19:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Per the address' talk page, "205.222.248.208, is registered to Montgomery County Public Schools." Montgomery County is in the greater Washington, DC area. This suggests that the deleting party is in close geographical proximity to the subject, which is weak evidence suggesting the subject is not widely known outside a small area. —C.Fred (talk) 00:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom.Bjones 19:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, article makes no assertion of notability. Absence of Google hits implies non-verifiability as well. —C.Fred (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete,--Peta 03:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, hey this seriously is the real fred schott. you guys can delete this if you want. this was made without my knowledge anyway —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.140.169.235 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.