Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Zain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-09 08:39Z 

Fred Zain

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Possibly notable. A forensic scientist who falsified results to convict several people. I really am not sure on the notability of that. Sasquatch t|c 23:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:N he ghits about the same as I do. Jeepday 00:54, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references from The New York Times. --Eastmain 02:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * weak keep we ideally need more than just that one case as illustration.DGG 03:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Sources have been provided that makes the article borderline notable. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 07:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The 3 non-trivial sources (2 NYT and 1 US News & World Report) suffice for establishing notability.  As a side note, the occurrence of such an event (not the perjury, but the lack of discovery for many years) is rather disturbing. -- Black Falcon 08:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.