Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freddie Gershon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Freddie Gershon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:BLPPROD requirement of articles containing "no sources in any form". However, it does not meet the requirement of "All BLPs must have at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article". Snowycats (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. At a glance, meets WP:AUTHOR - multiple independent periodical reviews of the novel (Washington Post, LA Times). These simply need to be added to the article. See WP:BEFORE. Larry Hockett (Talk) 18:15, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - I've actually added the sources, so now clearly meets WP:NAUTHOR Nosebagbear (talk) 15:22, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep added more book reviews in major newspapers, passes WP:AUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:05, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - I also added some content and sources. Subject is clearly widely covered in the media and well established with reliable sources. Easily passes WP:LAWYER and WP:AUTHOR, and meets notability guidelines. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 04:43, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.