Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freddy Van Marchena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Freddy Van Marchena

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to meet neither WP:MUSICIAN nor WP:AUTHOR. The only edited source in the article (Vulture) is an interview, is not about him, and does not mention him. Nor does it appear that he has other sigcov. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 06:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Bands and musicians. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 06:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge with Tyrannosaurus Rex — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:1C00:C001:A983:C7FD:A210:6715 (talk) 07:05, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Why?  VickKiang  (talk)  07:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * That's a joke from a vandal. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:31, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * IP blocked, should it be struck?  VickKiang  (talk)  20:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No need, because one jokey "merge" vote isn't wrecking the consensus below. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree, thanks.  VickKiang  (talk)  21:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I had to revert one of their edits on the 2014 FIFA World Cup final. Probably should have said something, lol. 808pikachu (talk) 01:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NMUSICIAN, WP:BASIC, WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. The refs are non-independent YouTube videos, non-RS (i.e., this), or an interview that does not appear to cover Freddy and is certainly not WP:SIGCOV, unfortunately I didn't find refs counting towards notability per WP:BEFORE. The merge target above is irrelevant and thoroughly unconvincing.  VickKiang  (talk)  07:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't pass WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG, no sources available. Entirely unnotable. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 12:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Good luck to our recent high school graduate as he figures out whether he wants to be a musician, writer, gardener, or genealogist (for the latter of those I think he needs to spend the next four years in college). People must qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia and it's not an extension of one's own social media. WP:NOTPROMOTION. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ways off from notability. WP:SNOW also applies. Fame isn't everything! gidonb (talk) 17:46, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No notability has been shown. In fact, it reads like a promo piece with no notable coverage. Clearly fails to meet WP:GNG and does not pass WP:BASIC. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 21:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Mostly written by one user, often with conflicting facts with each edit. I feel like it mainly falls under WP:NOTPROMOTION. 808pikachu (talk) 01:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: The pics at Wikicommons are also a concern - one in particular. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 13:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:45, 24 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.