Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freddy vs. Jason 2 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 08:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Freddy vs. Jason 2
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Crystal balling, no reliable sources actually confirming a movie will actually be made. Even if there was, per WP:NFF, unless the development is significant, we don't start pages for films until they have at least entered production and there is coverage of the production. Any reliable sources rumoring a sequel should be listed on Freddy vs. Jason. Also, nothing new has changed since the last AfD, which was a unanimous "delete".  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  13:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is based on a rumor, and the author even hints to his inability to provide sources for the time being. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 13:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unverificable, no reliable sources. --Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  14:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. No new information since last AfD; this looks like a candidate for criterion G4. Otherwise, strong delete and, per Bignole, discussion should go to the Freddy vs. Jason article unless/until a movie goes into production. —C.Fred (talk) 16:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my prodding of this article. J Milburn (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest redirecting this to the first FvJ article to avoid the untimely recreation of the article by over-enthusiastic horror fans, if there were a single reliable source on it, that is. If none can be found at all, then delete by all means.  Wikipedia isn't a rumourmill.     Paul    730  21:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - The notability guidelines for future films stipulate that a stand-alone article for a film should not be created until a project enters production. This is because many factors such as budget issues, scripting issues, and casting issues can interfere with the project, even if it has received a greenlight (which I understand this one hasn't). The article can be recreated without prejudice when and if principal photography is confirmed to have begun.  Steve  T • C 12:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, as it would apply better than WP:NFF here in having no verifiable coverage ensuring an upcoming film. Verifiable mention of a sequel's development should go on the preceding film's article since it's never guaranteed to begin production upon announcement.  Obviously, if this does begin filming, which I expect we'll find out with ease with a solid horror fan base, the article can be revived. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 12:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per C.Fred. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Currently on the verge of nonsense and consists of a few word sentence and a quote from a none-reliable source.--The Dominator (talk) 05:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.