Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Chilton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Schminnte &#91; 12:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Frederick Chilton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sources in the article are either primary or do not prove the character's notability, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to Hannibal Lecter (franchise) (perhaps not the best redirect target, but I can only think of that). Spinixster  (chat!)  02:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Literature, Film,  and Television.  Spinixster   (chat!)  02:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG
 * 1) SIGCOV in The Silence of the Lambs: Critical Essays on a Cannibal, Clarice, and a Nice Chianti
 * 2) SIGCOV in The Silence of the Lambs: Devil's Advocates by Barry Forshaw
 * 3) SIGCOV in The Silence of the Lambs by Yvonne Tasker
 * (See also Articles for deletion/Jack Crawford (character) for my concerns about this set of 8 nominations in 7 minutes)
 * &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:07, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I cannot access these sources because they don't have previews available for the pages that mention the character, but I will AGF and say that they do talk about the character extensively. If someone else can access and give me a thumbs up, that'd be great. Spinixster   (chat!)  08:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't want to paste too much, but here's a bit from Forshaw and Tasker which I am able to read in full:
 * Here's one juicy quite from Forshaw:
 * Tasker:
 * &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:41, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is significant coverage, the character has been analysed. Kirill C1 (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:41, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is significant coverage, the character has been analysed. Kirill C1 (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is significant coverage, the character has been analysed. Kirill C1 (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Leaning keep per those above. BD2412  T 04:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep notable character. Lightburst (talk) 02:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.